Here are all the entries into my desert landforms video competition! I haven't decided on a winner yet so please vote for your favourite one (in terms of effort, geographical information and how interesting it is to watch) by giving it a thumbs up on YouTube or leaving a comment below.
NEW PAGE
Showing posts with label GEOG1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GEOG1. Show all posts
Thursday, 8 October 2015
Wednesday, 23 September 2015
Hydrology Key Terms Speed Matching Game
There are so many terms in the hydrological cycle it can all get a bit confusing. Test your knowledge of the key terms by matching them up to their definitions (click on the image above to get to the game). All you need to do is drag the correct word down to the definition at the top of the list to make it disappear, and you can also time yourself to see how quickly you get all the definitions to vanish!
Saturday, 19 September 2015
A Plant's Guide to Desert Survival
Water. That's one thing us plants need on a regular basis or else we'll just shrivel up and die, right? If your owner is going away on holiday they damn well better get the neighbour to water us; or get some of those special hydrating crystals!

But did you know that not all plants are like this? Oh no, some plants can survive for yeeeaars without any water... some plants amputate their own limbs to survive! ... Some plants can even come back... from the dead!
How do they do this?! I hear you ask, is it magic?
Not quite, but it's close! These amazing plants have special adaptations that enable them to live right out in the middle of a desert! The last place you'd ever find me!
You can categorise these fellas into four main types. Let's have a look at them in more detail:
Labels:
Adaptations
,
Desert Plants
,
Ephemeral
,
GEOG1
,
Halophyte
,
Phreatophyte
,
Xerophyte
Saturday, 12 September 2015
Describing Patterns and Using Locational Knowledge
A common question in the exam is
to describe the pattern or distribution of something on a map.
Many people lose
marks on these questions due to poor exam technique. There are two things that
can help you:
1. Make
sure you know what distribution or pattern means and what words to use
Distribution = the way in which something is spread over an area
Pattern = they way in which something is arranged or sequenced
As you can see they are quite
similar. You need to identify whether there is any overall arrangement or
repeating sequence or shape to what you are looking at. Good words/phrases to
use include:
Labels:
A2
,
AS
,
Distribution
,
Exam Technique
,
GEOG1
,
GEOG2
,
Maps
,
Patterns
,
Regions
,
Revision
Exam Technique - How to Describe
So, I thought it would be a good idea to write some posts on specific aspects of exam technique. Having marked many many exam questions over the years I am convinced that knowing what to do in the exam is just as important as revising information. Obviously you need to know the information first before you can apply it to the exam, but just revision alone is not enough for a top grade.Understanding command words is key. Even the simplest one can be misunderstood. Let's start with 'DESCRIBE'. This is one of the most straight forward things that you could be asked to do. However, many people make mistakes with this command word and end up losing easy marks.
Monday, 20 April 2015
Learning about Salt Lakes with Top Gear!
One of my students suggested that we do a revision lesson on salt lakes using the Top Gear Botswana special, so I will be using this with my students next week. Thank to Chris for the idea!
Labels:
AS
,
Botswana
,
deserts
,
Exam Technique
,
GEOG1
,
Makgadikgadi
,
Revision
,
Salt Lakes
,
Salt Pans
,
Top Gear
Monday, 13 October 2014
River Rejuvenation Experiment!
I found some of those little channels on the beach as the tide was going out so thought I'd try illustrating some river processes; try it yourself next time you're on the beach!
Friday, 18 April 2014
HEALTH IN THE UK
REGIONAL VARIATIONS IN HEALTH AND MORBIDITY
Revision suggestion
– Try marking all the descriptions on an outline map and annotating it with
explanations. Then try doing it again from memory.
NB: Links between
illnesses and factors such as age, income, wealth etc are difficult to
establish. Remember, just because lots of people in a poor area are ill it
doesn’t necessarily mean than they are ill because they are poor or vice versa.
It is just a possible reason it does not provide evidence 100%, there could be
many other factors involved.
Monday, 14 April 2014
MALNUTRITION AND FAMINE
IN ETHIOPIA
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
·
Ethiopia
is a land-locked country in Eastern Africa. Wadla, in the Amhara region is
badly affected
·
One
of the least developed and poorest countries in the world with a GDP of $470
per capita
·
Malnutrition
is one of the main health problems facing the population; they have also experienced
several prolonged and widespread famines and many Ethiopians are chronically
hungry.
CAUSES
·
Drought: is the most commonly given reason for famine
is drought, and parts of Ethiopia have unpredictable rainfall that can lead to
droughts. e.g. in 2011 the March-May rainy season failed, which was thought to
be caused by La Nina, an abnormal cooling of waters in the Pacific Ocean. Wadla
is in an arid region and experiences extreme diurnal temperature ranges which
can damage crops
·
Poverty: The main factor leading to famine in
Ethiopia is poverty. Poor people do not have the resources to deal with shocks,
and are more likely to be pushed into unsustainable ways of coping such as
selling equipment, sending children out to work or eating less. Wadla is an
isolated area with a lack of infrastructure: only 13.5m of road and no electricity, transport, telephone or postal
services.
·
Agriculture:. In Ethiopia, individuals do not own land;
it is assigned according to the size of a family, and redistributed every few
years. Every time land is redistributed it is divided between more people, so
each farmer gets less. Lack of investment, and the need for large yields from a
small area, leads to land degradation. The
average amount of land for a household
in Wadla is only 1.1 hectares. Over-exploitation of wood for fuel and
timber has led to deforestation while overcrowding means that it is not unusual
to graze up to 40 sheep on 0.1 hectare
of land. These factors have led to severe soil erosion.
·
Conflict: There have been frequent conflicts in
Ethiopia. In the early 1990s, 60% of the national budget was being spent on
war. Obviously this reduces the money available to improve agriculture or
provide relief for hungry people. The Arab Spring across the Middle East and North
Africa led to a decline in the demand for livestock exports from Ethiopia,
reducing the incomes of the affected communities
·
Trade: Unequal trading systems also
contribute to hunger in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian government purchase crops from
farmers at low fixed prices. International organisations encourage Ethiopia to
produce cash crops to export, which reduces the land available for growing
crops. The world price for agricultural exports such as coffee is also very
low. In Wadla over 95% of people depend
on subsistence farming and there are very few opportunities for formal
work. People with little or no land find it especially hard to ensure they have
enough food.
CONSEQUENCES
·
Malnutrition
can severely affect the growth and development of children, 44% of children in
Ethiopia are affected by stunting; a word used to describe the diminished
physical and mental capacity of children who do not receive enough vitamins and
nutrients from an early age. E.g. a 15 year old child may have the mental
capacity and height of a 6 year old. Many
children are so badly affected they do not survive.
·
Malnourished
people are more susceptible to other infections and more likely to suffer
complications.
·
Those
who survive have a reduced capacity to contribute to the economy of the country
as they are less able to learn new skills and less productive in their work.
·
It has been estimated that the annual value of the loss
in productivity that can be attributed to child stunting is 2.9 billion ETB
(Ethiopian Birr). Moreover, iodine deficiency, which results in irreversible
impairment of intellectual capacities, has been estimated to cost the Ethiopian
economy 1.35 billion ETB per year.
STRATEGIES
TO MANAGE THE ISSUE
·
Charities
such as ActionAid work with local people to: provide short term food aid;
improve farming methods; provide farmers with loans to buy new equipment and
train locals in land conservation.
·
They
also train people in other skills e.g. carpentry so they have an alternative
income rather than relying on subsistence farming and improve infrastructure to
create easier access to markets and food aid.
Discussion point: What is the biggest cause of famine
in Ethiopia and can it be overcome?
Sunday, 13 April 2014
POLAND AND THE UK
CAUSES AND IMPACTS OF
MIGRATION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
·
Poland was admitted to the EU on 1st April 2004 and with this came the
right for any citizen of Poland to move and work freely in other EU countries.
·
Polish people are now the 3rd
largest minority in the UK.
PUSH FACTORS
·
High levels of unemployment – in 2005, 18.5% of
those at working age were unemployed in Poland compared to 5.1% in the UK.
Annual GDP was £13k in Poland compared to £30k in the UK.
·
Low income for the available jobs, deprived living
conditions, poor public services and amenities
PULL FACTORS
·
A typical Polish worker could earn 5 times the sum
they could in the UK compared to what they could earn in Poland
·
Plenty of obtainable jobs in the UK due to a skills
deficiency
·
The UK was one of only three countries who didn’t
put a limit on the number of migrants from A8 countries who could enter the
country. (A8 countries are Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia
and Slovenia)
·
English is the second language in Poland and so
there wasn’t a huge language barrier to overcome
·
Migration to the UK was easy due to cheap flights and
travel links
IMPACTS OF EMIGRATION ON POLAND
·
‘Brain
drain’ of skilled workers and loss of entrepreneurial spirit may impact on
economic development
·
Some
regions may suffer a spiral of deterioration that is difficult to get out of
·
Shortage
of workers for typically male jobs such as plumbers and firefighters and builders.
·
Marriage
rates fall and family structures break down as the population structure becomes
imbalanced
·
However,
women have found it easier to find employment with less competition from men.
·
Remittances
more than doubled from 2004 to 2008
·
There
is less pressure on resources and eturning migrants from the UK bring new
skills
·
Despite
the labour shortages Poland is the only member of
the European Union that has not fallen into a recession and that has continued
to grow economically.
IMPACTS OF IMMIGRATION ON THE UK
·
£2.54bn
contributed annually to the UK economy by Eastern Europeans
·
80%
of migrants are work-age off-setting the problems of an ageing population
·
Migrant
workers helped to prevent inflation and an increase in mortgage costs
·
Migrants
are stereotypically hard working, skilled and flexible and take up less
desirable jobs or fill gaps in the skilled work-force.
·
Creation
of a multicultural society increases tolerance; new local services and
good/clothes/music
·
However,
much of the money made is sent back home as remittances
·
Increased
number of people put pressures on resources such as schools and healthcare
·
Large-scale
migration to areas that have not experienced it before have led to tensions and
misunderstandings e.g. anti-Polish graffiti and isolated incidents of attacks,
especially in N.Ireland.
Discussion point: Do the benefits of migrants to the
UK’s ageing economy outweigh the problems?
Wednesday, 9 April 2014
RIVER KISSIMMEE
SOFT ENGINEERING IN A MORE DEVELOPED
COUNTRY
WHAT IS THS BACKGROUND TO THIS
PROJECT?
·
The
river Kissimmee once meandered for 103 miles through central Florida.
·
Its
floodplain, which reached up to 3 miles wide, was regularly inundated with
heavy seasonal rain for long periods of time creating a unique and highest
diverse ecosystem in North America.
·
In
the 1940’s, the River Kissimmee endured prolonged flooding after a series of
hurricanes which had severe impacts on the people in the region. So drastic
measures were taken by the Central and Southern Florida Project and the
Kissimmee was cut and dredged and channelized (from 1960-1971) into a 30 feet deep straightway: the
C-38 canal.
·
Although
flood control benefits were achieved, it was soon considered to be an
‘ecological disaster as waterfowl numbers fells by 90% and Bald Eagle nesting
fell by 75%.
·
In
response a restoration project was authorised in 1992, which aims to be
completed by 2019.
HOW IS THE RIVER BEING RESTORED?
·
One
aim of this project was to return the river back to its meandering self and thus
restore its ecological integrity but another aim of the restoration was to
maintain flood protection.
·
The
meanders were formed by cutting out the original meander scars into oxbow lakes
and then connecting them to the river. The sediment was then used to backfill
the canal so the original meandering river could flow naturally.
·
The
upper and lower portions of Canal 38 will remain channelized to maintain flood
protection benefits, while the middle 22 miles of canal are being replaced with
40 miles of meandering river.
·
The
total cost of the project is estimated to be around $500m including the
acquisition of 102k acres of floodplain that was previously used for
farming/human habitation.
WHAT IMPACTS HAS THIS PROJECT HAD?
·
Dissolved oxygen levels have increased and sand
bars have reformed on the river bed providing new habitats to support greater
biodiversity.
·
Flora and fauna such as the Black-Bellied Whistling Duck, that
disappeared when the system was channelized have returned in great numbers and
are now thriving in the newly restored system.
·
The
wider Kissimee basin is now protected from flooding by both soft and hard
engineering methods. The restored floodplain will store water and decrease lag
time naturally whilst the remaining canal & dams allow discharge to be
regulated artificially.
·
The
river is now important for tourism and education. For example the Riverwoods
Field Laboratory hosts ecologists carrying out research and runs eco-tours of
the river.
· The
newly restored the floodplain is now open for public recreation such as
horse-riding and camping, bird-watching and fishing.
Discussion point: Was the restoration a good idea for flood
protection?
With thanks to Yasmin Karabasic
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
UK FLOODS 2014
FLOODING IN A MORE DEVELOPED COUNTRY
BACKGROUND INFO
· GDP per capita ~$36 000
· Between December 2013 and February 2014 large areas of the UK experienced an exceptional run of severe winter storms, culminating in serious coastal damage and widespread flooding.
CAUSES
· A series of storms brought extremely heavy and prolonged rainfall with some areas such as Winchester experiencing levels over 300% above average.
· Some studies suggest that anthropogenic Climate Change has increased the intensity and rainfall lvels of Atlantic storms although there is no definitive evidence for this.
· Several rivers including the River Parrett in the Levels and the River Thames in London overflowed their banks, while in other parts of the country such as the village of Hambledon in Hampshire the ground became so saturated that the water table reached the surface.
· The Somerset Levels are only around 8m above sea level and thus is naturally prone to flooding. Man-made drainage and flood defence systems have been practised since Roman times for farming.
· Some have blamed the floods on human management of the area and have even accused the Labour government of ‘deliberately engineering’ the floods. For example, rivers such as the River Parrett had not been dredged since the late 1990s but the Environment Agency claims this would not have prevented the floods and may have worsened flooding downstream.
IMPACTS
· Several people were killed by secondary effects; for example a 7 years old boy died from carbon monoxide poisoning as his family tried to clear their home with industrial water pumps.
· Over 7000 homes and 3000 commercial properties across England and Wales were flooded and thousands experienced power cuts. Insurers have estimated a cost of around £40k of repair work per household. However this is small in comparison to the 55 000 homes and businesses flooded in 2007.
· The low-lying Somerset Levels were badly affected with 10% of the 650km2 area submerged.
· Many people have had to take time off work or have been able to get to work, while farmers have struggled with flooded fields and ruins crops. However there could be a benefit for farmers who were unaffected if spoiled produce leads to price rises but it is too early to tell if that will happen.
· Conservationists have reported the deaths of 600 sea birds and 250 seals in the storms while inland hibernating animals were badly affect and 5000 fish were found dead in fields in Oxfordshire after the floods subsided. However, waterfowl have benefited as it has increased the area of their habitat.
· Estimates of economic damage range from £630m ($1b) for insurance and repairs, up to £14b ($23b) (1% of GDP) if you include the losses incurred by businesses in the Thames Valley. However, flood protection companies have benefited, such as Van Heck who has sent more than 20 industrial size pumps to Somerset.
RESPONSES
· A large-scale response was initiated involving the military with homes evacuated and 150 rescued in 24 hours along the Thames. However, when Prince Charles visited the SL’s he criticised the government’s slow response with one woman in Somerset being trapped in her home for 13 days.
· £14m has been paid out by the government to help communities recover including £5000 per house.
· Dredging started at the end of March with £5.8m spent on clearing 5 miles of the Tone & Parrett rivers.
· A scheme called ‘Flood Re’ is set to be introduced in 2015 to help people with rising flood insurance.
Discussion point: Could this flooding have been prevented?
Labels:
AS
,
Case Studies
,
flooding
,
GEOG1
,
Rivers Floods and Managements
,
UK Floods 2014
Friday, 28 March 2014
PAKISTAN FLOODS 2010
FLOODING IN A LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRY
BACKGROUND INFO
·
GNP
per capita ~$2700
·
Flooding
began in July 2010; at one point ~1/5
of Pakistan’s total land area was submerged including 69,000km2 of fertile crop land.
CAUSES
·
The river Indus normally floods every year but
in 2010 there was prolonged and heavy e.g. 274mm fell in 24 hours in Peshawar on July 29th
2010. More than half the normal monsoon rains fell in only a week instead of 3months.
One reason could have been unusual conditions in the polar jet stream.
·
The
river Indus carries a lot of sediment and mud from the Himalayas, which silts
up the channel and make it more prone to flooding.
·
Others think anthropogenic climate
change could have strengthened monsoon rains, whilst deforestation in the
Himalayas has reduced the river’s lag time.
·
Levees built for flood defence were breached
and caused sudden huge releases of floodwater.
·
The massive human impact occurred because 2/3rds
of
Pakistan’s citizens rely on agriculture for their income and many of them live
close to rivers for access to water and fertile alluvial soils.
·
In some places such as the Swat Valley, infrastructure had already been
weakened by the 2005 earthquake and not yet repaired.
IMPACTS
·
Flooding
submerged whole villages within the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, killing at
least 1,600 people, according to the UN. Twelve million were affected in Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces, while a further two million were affected in
Sindh.
·
Floods directly affected about 20 million people (more than the
boxing-day tsunami and Haiti earthquake combined), mostly by destruction of
property, livelihood and infrastructure including 100s of bridges and 200
health facilities.
·
The World Health Organization reported that ten million people were
forced to drink unsafe water.
·
The total economic impact may
have been as much as US$43 billion including damage to the important cotton
industry (Pakistan was previously the 4th largest cotton producer)
as 80% of fields were left waterlogged in some areas and crops and livestock
were drowned.
·
Illnesses such as gastroenteritis, diarrhoea,
and skin diseases occurred due to lack of clean drinking water and
sanitation. Pakistan also faced a malaria and
cholera outbreak.
·
There were also long-term impacts including: food insufficiencies
leading to malnutrition, damage to schools, Taliban insurgencies and an increase
from 33-40% of people living below the poverty line.
RESPOSES
·
France donated €1.05
million and 35 tonnes of emergency supplies including tarpaulins,
blankets, shelters and anti-cholera medicines, while the UK donated £134.5 million.
·
The United States donated
71 million dollars as well as 56,000
ready meals and two temporary bridges to help reconnect. They also built water
filtration plants.
·
However after 6 months charities were
surprised by the slow international response as only 56% of
the $1.96 billion requested by the Pakistani government had been given. This
could be due to the global phenomenon of “donor fatigue”. President
Zardari was also criticized for his slow response. Many felt the Pakistani Army
was slow to rebuild bridges, deliver aid or set up relief camps.
·
In the longer term flood warning systems are
being funded by charities such as Oxfam and the US government, including radio stations used to educate people of the danger of flood water
and the different toxins and diseases in it meaning that people will be
more prepared next time.
Discussion point: Who was worst affected by these floods?
Could they have been avoided?


