or No Security Without Development?
The
sustainable improvement of the well-being, equality and freedom of a country’s
citizens through advancements in services and infrastructure such as education,
healthcare and employment.
What
is security?
Safety from threats including conflict and crime, hunger and disease; established through a well governed and policed society. Freedom from fear and from want; protection from sudden and hurtful disruptions to daily life; knowledge that time and money invested in education will improve one’s chances in life.
Safety from threats including conflict and crime, hunger and disease; established through a well governed and policed society. Freedom from fear and from want; protection from sudden and hurtful disruptions to daily life; knowledge that time and money invested in education will improve one’s chances in life.
Although
these terms may seem very similar the key difference is that development
involves growth/improvement/change over the long-term whereas security is the
short-term/immediate safety that allows you to think about improving your life
and conversely is achieved by the improvement of your life.
How do they interact?
The main point to understand is that these two factors tend to go hand in hand; they can be seen as ‘interdependent’ or ‘mutually reinforcing’: most rich and developed countries are also secure, while many poor and undeveloped countries are insecure. The issue up for discussion is why this is and is traditionally looked at in two ways:
NO DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT SECURITY
The main point to understand is that these two factors tend to go hand in hand; they can be seen as ‘interdependent’ or ‘mutually reinforcing’: most rich and developed countries are also secure, while many poor and undeveloped countries are insecure. The issue up for discussion is why this is and is traditionally looked at in two ways:
NO DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT SECURITY
Development
can’t happen unless a place is secure first. Not only this but insecurity can
actually cause development to go backwards, i.e. insecurity can cause poverty. This lack of security could be a war
that destroys infrastructure and disrupts education; it could be an
environmental disaster that has similar effects. It could also be something
more subtle such as poor environmental conditions (e.g. water insecurity) or
poor political and economic conditions (e.g. insecurity of land tenure) that
make it difficult for people to improve their lives.
NO SECURITY WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT
NO SECURITY WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT
A place cannot become secure unless it
reaches a certain level of development first. In fact, a lack of development
(i.e. impoverished conditions) can actually cause a place to become more
insecure. This is because without a good
infrastructure and organised policing system crime will be more prevalent, and
without a good quality of life citizens will be more likely to engage in crime
or even armed struggles to try to improve their lives. Without a good
irrigation system a farmer cannot have food security as he doesn’t know when
the next crop failure could occur. Without an earthquake proof house it is
difficult to be secure from hurtful disruptions to daily life if you know your
house could collapse and kill you at any minute.
The
complexity of the relationship is illustrated by Lael Brainard who describes
the link between poverty (i.e. a lack of development) and insecurity as a ‘tangled web’ but summarises by simply saying:
‘Poverty is both a cause of
insecurity and a consequence of it’
NO DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT SECURITY
NIGERIA’S INSECURE GOVERNMENT HAS HINDERED DEVELOPMENT
‘In the short run it’s hunky
dory, but in the long run, it’s humpty dumpty’ - Paul Collier
He
found that all countries who discovered and exported a new resource such as
oil experienced significant short-term growth in GDP, but that countries with a
poor system of governance (i.e. political insecurity) ended up worse off than
before in the long term, whilst countries with good governance continued to see
an increase in GDP. This is known as the ‘resource curse’ and illustrates how
difficult it is for insecure countries to develop long-term.
Nigeria is the third biggest economy
in Africa, largely due to its discovery and export of oil since the 1950s. In
2000 oil and gas exports accounted for 98% of Nigeria’s earnings and GDP more
than doubled between 2005 and 2010. At first the discovery of oil led really
stimulated the economy and gave the population great hopes for development.
However, today 45% of people still live below the poverty line. Most Nigerians
are now poorer than they were in the 1960s.
This is because Nigeria had such a
poor system of governance when the oil was discovered, i.e. it was insecure. This lead to the following
events that hindered development and even made it go backwards in the long run:
- Nigeria’s oil industry is extremely corrupt meaning that 80% of the country’s energy revenues benefit only 1% of the population.
- When the oil was discovered the farmers who lived there were forced off their land by the Nigerian government and it was given to oil companies including Royal Dutch Shell. Farmers were given compensation based on the value of the land for crops, while the government earned the value of the land based on oil.
- A lack of environmental legislation means the discovery of oil has been a disaster for the environment with thousands of oil spills (>7000 in 30 years) in the Niger Delta. This had severe consequences on the farming and fishing industry.
- At the same time, although 2/3 of people are employed in fishing or agriculture, the government has neglected these industries for years leading to decreased productivity and income.
INSECURITY IN SYRIA IS CAUSING DEVELOPMENT TO GO BACKWARDS
‘War is development in
reverse’ – Paul Collier
According to
the Syrian Center for Policy Research (SCPR) the armed conflict in Syria is a ‘war
on development’ and it has cited a range of evidence to support this claim. The
war is ‘obliterating physical, financial, human and social capital’ resulting
in a restructuring of the economy towards agriculture – a sector that is
traditionally more dominant in less developed countries.
Infrastructure
and services are being degraded, there is a rise in the informal sector and a
weakening of human capital. Total economic loss as of June 2013 was estimated
to be $103 billion. Around 3000 schools have been damaged or destroyed and only
50% of children are currently attending. The number of doctors per person has
fallen from 1:700 to 1:4000 Syria’s HDI is now 20% lower than it was in 2011.
NO SECURITY WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT
NIGERIA’S LACK OF DEVELOPMENT IS CAUSING INSECURITY
Even though Nigeria has discovered oil
and could potentially became a rich and developed country, the government has
failed to invest its resource wealth into development, instead keeping it for
themselves and leaving the majority of the population in poverty. This has made
it very difficult for the country to be secure and had even made it less secure
than before as the following events have unfolded:
- In response to the government’s failure to invest in these industries, failure to share oil wealth with the general population and failure to implement environmental laws, militant groups emerged such as MEND (the Movement for Emancipation of the Niger Delta) and demanded to be given their share of oil revenues and for the environmental degradation to be stopped. They have killed 4 oil workers, hijacked 12 ships and kidnapped 33 sailors working for oil companies since 2012.
- At the same time competition for oil wealth among the impoverished citizens who reside in the Nile Delta has fuelled violence between many ethnic groups and various military factions have developed to try to seize control. Nearly the entire region has been militarized as a result of the discovery of oil in a poorly developed country.
- The government has tried to repress the conflict using further military force but this has only served to make things worse. In all thousands of civilians including children have been beaten, raped and killed and hundreds of thousands have been displaced from their homes.
AFGHANISTAN’S LACK OF DEVLOPMENT IS MAKING IT
DIFFICULT TO ATTAIN SECURITY
‘In the absence
of the growth of the licit economy, the illicit economy will take over’ – Ashita Mittal
Afghanistan has experienced a
continuous state of conflict since the 1970s, which has made it very difficult
for the country to develop. However, until it becomes more developed it will be
very difficult to attain peace and security.
This can be illustrated by the opium
economy, which reached a record high with 200k hectares planted in 2013,
despite the fact that UK troops have been sent to Helmand specifically to try
and reduce opium production. Afghanistan produces more than 90% of the world’s
opium (the main ingredient in heroin), a trade which is inextricably linked to
both development and security.
Afghanistan is one of the poorest
countries in the world. 42% live below the national poverty line and 20% are
only just above. There are high levels of illiteracy in rural areas and most
are completely dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. Climatic
conditions are also difficult with sparse precipitation in summer and months of
winter snow making crop yields unreliable. Only 40% of the land is irrigated
and often ineffectively particularly in the poorest areas.
Over 75% of Afghan people live in
rural areas where agriculture is primary activity. Opium poppy cultivation
started in the 1970s as gross income per hectare was 12 – 30 times higher than
the country’s staple, wheat. Poppies are also easier to grow and easier to
sell.
Until the country develops enough to
offer alternative sources of income for these people, it looks like the illegal
opium economy will only continue to grow.
However, this issue can also be looked
at in another way. Until Afghanistan has a secure and well policed society
where laws the ban poppy farming are actually enforced, poppy farmers have
little motivation to develop other sources of income, this hindering the
development of the country as a whole. Despite being illegal, many officials
have their own share in the opium economy, and in some areas, even if they don’t
want to grow poppies, farmers are persuaded or scared into doing so by the Taliban
to help fund their insurgencies.
ALTERNATIVE VIEWS
‘War is not development in reverse’ – Human Security Report 2012
Studies show that several development
indicators appear to improve during periods of conflict, i.e. that development
can still happen despite a lack of security. According to the HSR of 2012, Paul
Collier’s description, whilst true in some cases, is not an accurate description
of the impact of war, including on health and education. In fact, many
conflict-affected countries experience improving development indicators even in
the worst affected countries.
It is true that in some cases there is
a slow-down of the rate of improvement but not an overall decline. Few
conflicts today are destructive or deadly enough to reverse national trends.
However, in other cases, even the rate of improvement increases. An example is
Afghanistan, which experienced a dramatic increase in school enrolments after
the overthrow of the Taliban, despite ongoing insurgency.
In a study by the UNESCO Institute for
Statistics (UIS) only 11% of countries experienced a reversal in educational
trends during conflict, while 40% has higher levels after the conflict compared
to before.
‘War can be a catalyst for positive social and political change’ –
SOAS, University of London
Some studies
even suggest that a lack of security can have a positive impact on development
long-term.
Despite the
negative consequences of conflict, historical evidence suggests that it has
actually had a positive role in development. For example, fighting alongside
each other can cause be a unifying experience that creates common identities;
e.g. the world wars were key in developing national identities for many British
Colonies. Allowing conflicts to run their course, sort out grievances and
exhaust readiness to fight can be far more successful in achieving long term
piece than enforcing peace agreements in which nobody really agrees. As a
catalyst for positive change the American Civil war can be used as an example
for abolishing slavery, arguably the beginning of racial equality in the US.
References
NB - A simple Google search of 'No Development without Security' will bring up numerous websites discussing the issue. I highly recommend browsing through some of these sites so you get a 'feel' for the topic and then decide on a few examples you can learn to use in an essay.